The Physiological Mechanisms Underlying Animal Physiology Review – Science & Maths Assignment Help

Assignment Task

Task 

Critically review a scientific article
In this task you are required to critically review a scientific article. Specifically you will evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of an article’s ideas by assessing the article’s value to the scientific field. Your critique should focus on the appropriateness of the literature used to justify the research, research questions (aims) being addressed in the article, the methods used, and consider the data and interpretation of the data. You should also comment on the quality of the writing and associated graphics. The critical review should start with a clear and correct citation of the paper and should be supported with a reference list to support your observations or concerns about the paper.

You are to select one of the peer-reviewed articles provided on the Interact2 Subject Site and write a critical review of this article.

This assessment task will assess the following learning outcome/s:

• be able to distinguish and consider the physiological mechanisms underlying animal physiology.
• be able to identify and evaluate the anatomical adaptations of animals enabling them to survive in different environments.

PRESENTATION

Your assessment task should be presented in the form of an essay, and should contain the following:

1. Introduction: Your introduction should provide a brief overview a statement of your thesis (overall opinion of the text), the purpose of the article (ie. research/experiment objectives); and briefly comment on how the article relates to other work on the same subject. You may also include information about the author’s reputation or authority in the field of the background to the experiment.

2. Body: You should provide a critique (discussion and evaluation) of the strengths, weakness and notable features of the scientific article. You should also include other references to support your evaluation. It is recommended that you reference from peer-reviewed journal articles mostly. Your critique should focus on the article’s introduction (literatured used to justify their research), objectives/aims, methods, data and interpretation of data. You can also include recommendations for how the text can be improved in

3. Conclusion: You should restate your overall opinion of the text. If necessary, some further qualification or explanation of your judgement can be included. This can help your critique sound fair and reasonable.

4. References: (words not counted, not included in word count)

This Science & Maths Assignment has been solved by our Science & Maths Expert at TV Assignment Help. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing Style. Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. 

You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turn tin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.