Approved-online-essay-writers

New Study Claims to Find Genetic Link Between Creativity and Mental Illness – Mental Health Assignment Help

Assignment Task

YOU CAN CRITIQUE THE ARTICLE ON FORMAT AND/OR CONTENT AND/OR LANGUAGE AND CLARITY AND/OR RESEARCH
Losing One’s Mind: A Review of “New study claims to find genetic link between creativity and mental illness”
There is a historic debate over whether creativity can be linked to mental illness, and Ian Sample’s (2015) “New study claims to find genetic link between creativity and mental illness” provides evidence supporting both sides of the argument. It discusses a recent study in which researchers found that people in creative professions are 25% more likely to carry genes that increase risk of bipolar disorder and schizophrenia (Sample, 2015, para.3). Sample also provides quotes from various critics opposing these findings as well as alternative reasons for this correlation not due to mental illness. The writing has numerous problems which make it disappointing work as a professional article, however it does provide ample evidence to support both sides of the argument.
To start, the title, which should reflect the article’s main idea, implies that it will be about the evidence supporting a link between creativity and mental illness. While this idea is briefly discussed, it is later deconstructed by critique from Harvard professor Albert Rothenburg (2014), who believes that “there is no good evidence for a link between mental illness and creativity” (as cited in Sample, 2015, para.12). This opinion is actually written in a way that would outweigh
the findings of the study if only Sample had included any evidence to support Rothenburg’s claim. The author basically contradicts himself, as the first half of his article presents findings from a study that supports the claim of a link, and then the second half completely disagrees. The result is a relatively unbiased article? however, it is one which does not provide enough information for the reader to form their own opinion. Overall the article’s beginning is not successful in introducing the topic.
After the introduction the writer transitions to the article’s body and provides some research statistics to substantiate the title’s claim. This part is done well, as Sample states the findings of a recent study in a way that is easy to understand. However, as the study is being presented it is interrupted by an irrelevant quote of the lead researcher. The interruption disrupts the article’s flow and distracts from the evidence of the study. This brings us to another problem with the article: it uses too many quotes from different people rather than concentrating on one topic. Sample tends to lose focus and include unnecessary information, and the result is a piece that lacks a central voice.
In contrast to these weaknesses, there are several technical aspects of the article that were done well. Besides the previously mentioned interrupting quote, most are integrated nicely and provide fuel for the presented argument. The author has also chosen to quote qualified scientists and professors, one of which is shown at the beginning of this review. By quoting experts he adds a higher level of validity to the article. The language used is suitable for the general public,
which is good considering that the author is a science editor and therefore may have been tempted to use jargon. The only real technical error came in formatting, as the article is cut into short paragraphs sometimes consisting of only two or three sentences. Besides that, however, the article’s overall impression is professional.
While the technicalities stood out, the conclusion unfortunately did not. It ends suddenly, with a long quote which in no way signals the article’s end. It appears as if the article could have continued, but instead it ends without warning. Overall the impression of the article is
unsatisfactory, as it does not clearly present the debate of mental health’s effect on creativity. The author should have included some reflection on both arguments, as well as more supporting evidence. However, he does provide a decent summary of the study mentioned in the article title. The summary is enough to compel readers to research the study themselves, but that is the only useful outcome of reading the article. Perhaps Sample needed a little more insanity himself to write a stronger creative piece.

Welcome to our Online Essay Writing Agency. Securing higher grades costing your pocket? Order your assignment online at the lowest price now! Our online essay writers are able to provide high-quality assignment help within your deadline. With our homework writing company, you can order essays, term papers, research papers, capstone projects, movie review, presentation, annotated bibliography, reaction paper, research proposal, discussion, or another assignment without having to worry about its originality – we offer 100% original content written completely from scratch

A-Plus Writing Help For University Students

Get expert assistance in any academic field. All courses and programs covered.

Get Help Now!

We write papers within your selected deadline. Just share the instructions

PLACE YOUR ORDER