Data in the Real World Case Study – Arts and Humanities Assignment Help

Assignment Task

Task

As many of you are in your first year of formal university study, and this ‘type’ of assignment is new to you, we are providing detailed notes of how to prepare and present your case study. These notes are designed to help you pass, they do not guarantee a high mark. For the highest grades, originality that comes with confidence and greater understanding of the topic would be expected. For those who are more confident in your writing, feel free to construct your argument as you wish, but make sure you address the 3 main points included in the “drafting your assignment” section. 

What you need to do:

1. Choose your case study: this should be an example of misinformation, disinformation, or fake news: (see list at the end of this document)

a. A list has been provided.

b. You MUST NOT use the example provided in the ACTION task for Module FIVE: if you do, then you will receive 0 for the assessment task.

c. Identify what kind of information the ‘case study’ is (is it misinformation, disinformation, or fake news).

d. Identify the original source of circulation for the case study. Use this as your reference point. You need to include a full citation to the original source at the start of your assignment (this is not included in the word count). You should then decide onan abbreviated ‘nickname’ for the case study item and use this within your discussion.

2. Analyse the case study (before writing) – you will be taken through an example of this in the ACTION task of Module 2. These questions are designed to help you ‘plot out’ your discussion: your assignment should not simply question-answer responses.

a. First reactions to the false narrative:

• What is the claim? Why does it exist?
• Do you instinctively trust what the claimant is saying? Why or Why not?
• What impact does the claim have when you don’t know if it is true or not?

b. The context of the claim:

• The ‘author’ of the claim (who is the original source of the misinformation/disinformation/fake news):
• Who is making the claim?
• Are there other parties who also make the claim?
• Do they have ‘authority’ to make that claim?
• Why are they making the claim? How does this fit with their ‘history’ and their ‘agenda’? (i.e. what else have they posted or discussed in the past/present)
• What other stakeholders (or interested parties) might exist?
• The context of the claim (why is the misinformation/disinformation/fake news being shared):
• What is the issue at its core?
• What is the timeline of the claim (i.e. how/when did the claim come about; what is the temporal/spatial context in which the claim was made?)
• What continues to keep this claim in circulation? (i.e. why do people know about it or talk about it)
• What are the implications of this claim being made?
• How is the issue discussed

c. Fact Checking the case study:

• What evidence is provided to support the claim?

d. Challenging the narrative – countering the claim:

• Using the library search engine (library.westernsydney.edu.au), what scholarly resources can you find to factcheck the story? What do these sources suggest: is the claim credible or not?
• Is there other information on the internet that gives you evidence for or against this claim? (be specific when you mention these in the assignment)
• How do you think that we can convince the general public of the ‘truth’? Why is this important?

3. Drafting your Assignment: (note there is a difference between writing and drafting)

a. Your assignment should be written in ‘essay-style’. In this task, you are to engage ‘formal academic writing style’: your audience are other academics. It needs to have a formal structure: a short introduction, a descriptive discussion of the case study, and an ‘extended conclusion’ that offers suggestions for how we can address the problems identified in this case study, and other similar ones. It is up to you whether you use subheadings to structure your work.

b. Short Introduction.

• In this section you need to introduce the concepts of misinformation, disinformation and fake news.
• You should define each term in your own words (i.e. no direct quotes). You must include a citation to at least one scholarly resource here: i.e. what you read to develop your understanding/definition of the core concepts.
• You should provide a statement about why these are problematic (generally).

This also needs to have a citation to a scholarly resource (it can be the same as the one you used for the definition)

• You should then identify what the case study is that you are discussing (but do not go into any description of the case study).

c. Descriptive discussion of the case study.

• In this section you need to present your analysis (completed above for point

2). You need to combine your analysis into articulate, well-structured paragraphs. You cannot discuss everything, so need to carefully construct your argument

• You should probably aim to have 2-3 paragraphs. (the guidelines here are NOT strict – they are merely guidance to those who have limited essay writing experience)
• The first one would introduce the case study, and why it is an example of misinformation. It would also be good to identify the “evidence” that it uses. It would not be necessary to include a citation to a scholarly resource here, but if you do use any resources to investigate or understand the topic, then you should acknowledge all sources.
• The second paragraph would discuss your analysis of the context of the claim. In particular, we will be looking for your ability to situate the misinformation/disinformation/fake news in its wider socio-political context. Remember this assignment is interested in the impact of misinformation/disinformation/fake news, and your case study is meant to be an example of the wider concern with the impacts of misinformation/disinformation. You need to cite at least one scholarly resource here.
• He third paragraph would challenge the narrative. This is where you present the evidence of your fact-checking, using evidence to counter the claim. It is very important to cite at least one scholarly resource in support of this discussion.

d. Suggestions for addressing the problem.

• This section functions like an extended conclusion. You need to think about how this misinformation/disinformation/fake news narrative can be challenged. It is important to include at least one citation to a scholarly resource in this section, and it is likely that a very good answer would include more.
• It is likely that you would remind us of why misinformation/disinformation/fake news are problematic, and how your case study is an illustration of these. In doing this, you would make suggestions of how specifically to challenge the misleading narrative around the issue the case study represents.
• Remember that your case study is meant to be an ‘example’ of a bigger problem, so you would to emphasise to the reader your suggestions for challenging misinformation/disinformation/fake news more generally here.
• As this is a very short essay, and should be written with impact, do not end by sitting on the fence: assert your argument, and ‘own’ the academic contribution and space you are occupying with your assessment.

4. The final step is editing your work.

• This assessment should be done with formal academic English. As communication is key part of the subject’s mission statement, you will be assessed on your ability to communicate with in a persuasive academic style.
• This is very important: presenting a poorly written piece of writing lessens the power of your argument.
• A high grade assessment (Distinction/High Distinction) will be eloquent, with very few/no grammatical or spelling errors. It is strongly advised that you make use of Studiosity and Study Smart appointments, if you know that your writing is ‘weak’.
• You should read through your work (out aloud is best) at least twice. Utilise the spelling and grammar check functions in your word processing program. 

This Arts and Humanities Assignment has been solved by our Arts and Humanities Expert at TV Assignment Help. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing Style. Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turn tin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.